Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners - key threatening process listing

NSW Scientific Committee - final determination

The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act, has made a Final Determination to list ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ as a KEY THREATENING PROCESS in Schedule 3 of the Act. Listing of key threatening processes is provided for by Part 2 of the Act.

 

The Scientific Committee has found that:

 

1. Extensive areas of eucalypt forests are increasingly affected by a form of tree canopy dieback that can be diagnosed by the presence of over-abundant populations of psyllid insects (Glycaspis spp.) often with over-abundant Bell Miner birds (Manorina melanophrys) (Wardell-Johnson et al. 2006). It is one expression of a range of dieback events in Australian eucalypt forests that may or may not have common underlying causes as yet poorly understood. The presence of psyllids and Bell Miners may be secondary and tertiary consequences of the syndrome, or they may contribute directly to the process of dieback. This form of dieback is particularly prevalent in north-eastern New South Wales, but also occurs south to Victoria. Dieback is initially expressed through leaf loss from the tips of twigs and branches, and can result in defoliation of whole trees and stands (Stone et al. 1995). It may include cycles of defoliation and regrowth, with fluctuating abundances of Bell Miners and psyllids, but if the causal factors persist it can lead to tree-death over extensive areas. Reproductive success of eucalypts in forests subjected to this form of dieback is typically low, and recruitment of new individuals tends to be poor due to reduced seed production and reduced seedling establishment as a consequence of weed invasion. In its most severe form, dieback results in the loss of forest structure.

 

2. The severity of this form of dieback varies across the forested area of NSW, although its extent has not been fully investigated. The forest types most susceptible to dieback are those dominated by Dunn’s White Gum (Eucalyptus dunnii), Sydney Blue Gum (E. saligna), Flooded Gum (E. grandis), Grey Ironbark (E. siderophloia), Narrow-leaved White Mahogany (E. acmenoides), Grey Gum (E. punctata) and Grey Ironbark (E. paniculata) (Bell Miner Associated Dieback Working Group, 2004). Other eucalypt species such as E. moluccana, Corymbia maculata and C. variegata may be affected, usually after a substantial decline in the most susceptible species. Mapping of affected areas has been most intensive in the Kyogle region where helicopter surveys indicated that almost 20% of 100,000 ha of susceptible forest types were affected by dieback attributable to this cause (State Forests of NSW, 2004). Of the affected area, approximately one third (6511 ha) has been assessed as ‘severe’, with ‘many dead trees, severe thinning of crowns, low stocking rate of susceptible species and greatly increased mesophyllic ground story vegetation including weeds such as lantana’ (State Forests of NSW, 2004). It has been estimated that 2.5 million ha of forest in New South Wales has the potential to be affected (Wardell-Johnson et al. 2006).

 

3. Most of the information on the number and range of species that are threatened by ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ comes from the Kyogle area where 39 species of threatened fauna and nine species of threatened flora occur in forests experiencing canopy dieback (Morrison in litt. 2007). Many of these species are dependent on habitat structure provided by eucalypt forests. For example, loss of old canopy trees reduces habitat for gliders and possums which, in turn, reduces prey availability for large forest owls. Tree death and reduced eucalypt recruitment will eventually contribute to a shortage of tree hollows for hollow-dependent fauna. ‘Loss of hollow-bearing trees’ is listed as Key Threatening Process under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995.

Threatened species recorded within the dieback-affected area surrounding Kyogle include the following:

Animals

 

Taxon

Common name

Status

Coeranoscincus reticulatus

Three-toed Snake-tooth Skink

Vulnerable

Hoplocephalus stephensii

Stephens' Banded Snake

Vulnerable

 

 

Mixophyes fleayi

Fleay's Barred Frog

Endangered

 

 

Calyptorhynchus lathami

Glossy Black-cockatoo

Vulnerable

Climacteris picumnus victoriae

Brown Treecreeper (eastern subsp.)

Vulnerable

Coracina lineata

Barred Cuckoo-shrike

Vulnerable

Cyclopsitta diophthalma coxeni

Double-eyed Fig-Parrot

Endangered

Dasyornis brachypterus

Eastern Bristlebird

Endangered

Menura alberti

Albert's Lyrebird

Vulnerable

Monarcha leucotis

White-eared Monarch

Vulnerable

Ninox connivens

Barking Owl

Vulnerable

Ninox strenua

Powerful Owl

Vulnerable

Podargus ocellatus

Marbled Frogmouth

Vulnerable

Ptilinopus magnificus

Wompoo Fruit-dove

Vulnerable

Ptilinopus regina

Rose-crowned Fruit-dove

Vulnerable

Ptilinopus superbus

Superb Fruit-dove

Vulnerable

Turnix melanogaster

Black-breasted Button-quail

Endangered

Tyto novaehollandiae

Masked Owl

Vulnerable

Tyto tenebricosa

Sooty Owl

Vulnerable

 

 

Petaurus australis

Yellow-bellied Glider

Vulnerable

Petaurus norfolcensis

Squirrel Glider

Vulnerable

Phascolarctos cinereus

Koala

Vulnerable

Aepyprymnus rufescens

Rufous Bettong

Vulnerable

Macropus dorsalis

Black-striped Wallaby

Endangered

Potorous tridactylus

Long-nosed Potoroo

Vulnerable

Thylogale stigmatica

Red-legged Pademelon

Vulnerable

Planigale maculata

Common Planigale

Vulnerable

Phascogale tapoatafa

Brush-tailed Phascogale

Vulnerable

Pseudomys gracilicaudatus

Eastern Chestnut Mouse

Vulnerable

Pseudomys oralis

Hastings River Mouse

Endangered

Falsistrellus tasmaniensis

Eastern False Pipistrelle

Vulnerable

Kerivoula papuensis

Golden-tipped Bat

Vulnerable

Miniopterus australis

Little Bentwing-bat

Vulnerable

Miniopterus schreibersii

Eastern Bentwing-bat

Vulnerable

Myotis adversus

Large-footed Myotis

Vulnerable

Nyctophilus bifax

Eastern Long-eared Bat

Vulnerable

Pteropus poliocephalus

Grey-headed Flying-fox

Vulnerable

Scoteanax rueppellii

Greater Broad-nosed Bat

Vulnerable

 

 

Plants

 

 

 

 

Taxon

Common name

Status

Callitris baileyi

Bailey’s Cypress Pine

Endangered

Clematis fawcettii

Northern Clematis

Vulnerable

Monotaxis macrophylla

Large-leafed Monotaxis

Endangered

Owenia cepiodora

Onion Cedar

Vulnerable

Plectranthus alloplectus

Narrow-leaved Plectranthus

Endangered

Rhynchosia acuminatissima

Pointed Trefoil

Vulnerable

Senna acclinis

Rainforest Cassia

Endangered

Sophora fraseri

Brush Sophora

Vulnerable

Wahlenbergia scopulicola

Rock-face Bluebell

Endangered

 

Threatened species from forests in other parts of NSW may also be adversely affected by this Key Threatening Process.

 

‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ is identified as a threat to White Gum Moist Forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion which is listed as an Endangered Ecological Community under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. It is considered to be a significant threat to remnants of the Blue Gum High Forest Ecological Community (C Stone in litt. 2006, A Jones in litt. 2007), which is listed as Critically Endangered under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. It is also considered as a threat to Grey Box (Eucalyptus moluccana) Grey Gum (Eucalyptus propinqua/Eucalyptus punctata) wet sclerophyll forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion.

 

In addition, the Regent Honeyeater (Xanthomyza phrygia) and Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolour) migrate to northern New South Wales in response to flowering of eucalypts such as Swamp Mahogany (Eucalyptus robusta), White Box (E. albens), Grey Box (E. moluccana) and Spotted Gums (Corymbia maculata) and (C. variegata). These bird species, listed as Endangered under the Threatened Species Conservation Act, could potentially be affected by declining habitat quality associated with dieback (J Morrison in litt. 2007).

 

4. Broad-scale canopy dieback associated with psyllids and Bell Miners usually occurs in disturbed landscapes, and involves interactions between habitat fragmentation, logging, nutrient enrichment, altered fire regimes and weed-invasion (Wardell-Johnson et al. 2006). At present, no single cause explains this form of dieback, and it appears that ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ cannot be arrested by controlling a single factor. Over-abundant psyllid populations and Bell Miner colonies tend to be initiated in sites with high soil moisture and suitable tree species where tree canopy cover has been reduced by 35 – 65 % and which contain a dense understorey, often of Lantana camara (C Stone in litt.). Such conditions arise as a consequence of landscape-level disturbance of forest ecosystems. ‘Invasion, establishment and spread of Lantana (Lantana camara L. sens. lat)’ is listed as a Key Threatening Process under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995.

 

5. Changed soil nutrient availability from altered fire regimes and fertilisers, and environmental stresses such as drought and water-logging can result in increased amino acid concentrations in leaves, increasing foliar quality for psyllids (Wardell-Johnson et al. 2006), although this is not a necessary condition for over-abundant psyllid populations (Stone and Simpson 2006). It has also been argued that long-term nitrogen accumulation in soils creates a poor root environment for eucalypts that can have a direct impact on tree health and increase susceptibility to pathogens (Turner et al. in litt. January 2008). A reduction in the frequency of low-intensity fires is believed to be an important cause of accumulation of soil nitrogen (Jurskis 2005a,b; Turner et al. in litt. January 2008). Increased light intensity associated with canopy reduction promotes the growth of the expanding foliage preferred by psyllids as well as understorey growth which is also influenced by altered fire regimes. Increased understorey growth, particularly of the invasive weed Lantana camara, suppresses eucalypt regeneration and provides enhanced shelter and safer nest sites for Bell Miners. The combined effect of a rich food resource and abundant shelter provides circumstances in which Bell Miner populations can become over-abundant. The positive interaction between bell miners and psyllids results in a superabundance of both species. Habitat fragmentation may also limit the opportunities for Bell Miner colonies to shift to new areas before the stage at which trees are unable to recover (Loyn et al. 1983, Clarke and Schedvin, 1999), contributing to forest decline. However, there have also been recent reports of ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ occurring in apparently undisturbed environments (P Meek in litt.). These observations require further investigation.

 

6. Psyllids and Bell Miners are both native fauna that naturally occur in moderate abundance in localised areas. Psyllids are sap-sucking insects that secrete a sugary shield (lerp) which provides them with some degree of protection from small predators and parasites. Psyllids and their lerps provide a rich food resource for leaf-gleaning birds, particularly small insectivores and nectarivores, and form a substantial component of their diets (Woinarski et al. 1989). Bell Miners are large native honeyeaters that live colonially and breed cooperatively with groups sometimes consisting of over 200 individuals in an area of several hectares (Clarke and Schedvin 1999). Bell Miners also consume psyllids and their lerps, but they may ‘farm’ them, possibly selecting large lerps and preferentially feeding on the lerps rather than consuming the insect itself (Loyn et al. 1983). Evidence of selectively avoiding the psyllid itself is currently inconclusive (Poiani 1993), and could simply be because Bell Miners may be attracted to sites with high numbers of psyllids. Situations have also been documented in which bell miners have occupied a new site without a pre-existing psyllid infestation (Dare et al. 2007). Irrespective of the mechanism, psyllid abundances and Bell Miner abundances are positively correlated (Loyn 1995; Stone and Simpson 2006).

 

7. Bell Miners exhibit high levels of inter-specific aggression and are extremely effective at excluding other species of birds from their territories (Clarke and Schedvin, 1999). When released from predation pressure by small birds through aggressive exclusion by Bell Miners, psyllid populations are able to increase to the extent that they lead to substantial canopy damage (Stone and Simpson 2006). In natural situations, these outbreaks are small scale. Bell Miner colonies tend to be relatively small, and colonies tend to move when the canopy is heavily defoliated (Clarke and Schedvin 1999). Consequently, Bell Miners may not always be evident at locations affected by this Key Threatening Process.

 

8. Due to the complex interaction between factors that have been altered as a consequence of landscape-level disturbance, there is at present no obvious means of arresting the threat presented by ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’. Moreover, expert opinion varies considerably as to which factors are causes of dieback and which factors are effects. Broad-scale research and adaptive management are required to understand how to best manage this threatening process, to prevent its expansion throughout forests of eastern New South Wales.

 

9. ‘Forest eucalypt dieback associated with over-abundant psyllids and Bell Miners’ is eligible to be listed as a Key Threatening Process as, in the opinion of the Scientific Committee:

 

(a) it adversely affects threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or

(b) could cause species, populations or ecological communities that are not threatened to become threatened.

 

Professor Lesley Hughes

Chairperson

Scientific Committee

Proposed Gazettal date: 31/12/08

Exhibition period: 31/12/08 – 26/12/08

 

References

 

Bell Miner Associated Dieback Working Group, (2004). The Bell Miner Associated Dieback (BMAD) Strategy. DEC Coffs Harbour.

 

Clarke MF, Schedvin N (1999). Removal of bell miners Manorina melanophrys from Eucalyptus radiata forest and its effect on avian diversity, psyllids and tree health. Biological Conservation 88, 111-120.

 

Dare AJ, McDonald PG, Clarke MF (2007). The ecological context and consequences of colonisation of a site by bell miners (Manorina melanophyrs). Wildlife Research 34, 616-623.

 

Jurskis V (2005a). Eucalypt decline in Australia, and a general concept of tree decline and dieback. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 1-20.

 

Jurskis V (2005b). Decline of eucalypt forests as a consequence of unnatural fire regimes. Australian Forestry 68, 257-262.

 

Loyn RH, Runnalls RG, Forward GW, Tyers J (1983). Territorial Bell Miners and other birds affecting populations of insect prey. Science 221, 1411-1412.

 

Loyn RH (1995). Bell Miners and the farming hypothesis – a comment. Emu 95, 145-146.

 

Poiani A (1993). Bell Miners: what kind of farmers are they? Emu 93, 199-194.

 

State Forests of NSW. (2004). Native forest dieback survey – north east region. State Forests of NSW Forest Health Survey Unit.

 

Stone C, Simpson JA (2006) Comparison of leaf, tree and soil properties associated with Eucalyptus saligna in a moist sclerophyll forest exhibiting canopy dieback. Cunninghamia. 9, 507-52.

 

Stone C, Spolc D, Urquart CA (1995). Survey of crown dieback in moist hardwood forests in the central and northern regions of NSW State Forests (Psyllid/Bell miner Research Programme). Research Paper No. 28. Research Division, State Forests of NSW, Sydney.

 

Wardell-Johnson G, Stone C, Recher H, Lynch AJJ (2006). Bell Miner associated dieback (BMAD) independent scientific literature review: a review of eucalypt dieback associated with bell miner habitat in north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. DEC NSW Occasional Paper DEC 2006/116.

 

Woinarski JCZ, Cullen JM, Hull C, Nayudu R (1989). Lerp-feeding in birds: a smorgasbord experiment. Australian Journal of Ecology 14, 227–234.

Page last updated: 28 February 2011